Well, if they don't change their minds, Apple is doing it again. They're ditching their chip architecture for the second time. First they went from the Motorola to the PowerPC, and now they seem to have decided to switch :) to the x86 arch. One thing is certain, they will have platforms much more mature and less locked in (bigger competition), but if they are smart about it and avoid dirty tricks people might decide to install OSX on their ordinary PCs. That means opening a potential new market with millions of users (and thousands of untested drivers by Apple but tested by the BSD and Linux guys). Will Apple be able to scale? Will they let go of their legendary closedness? Will the x86 deliver superior value? What about 64bit? Only time will tell. Of course OSX is still far from perfect, did you read the anandtech review where it demonstrated it's performance hit on threading compared to other systems?
You remember the scene with Bill Gates and Steve Jobs in the end of the movie Pirates of Silicon Valley? I wonder what would Jobs tell to Bill today :)
I however don't have any intention of throwing my good old key ornament that I got during the 90-ties when the PPC arch was introduced :)
PS. This is all speculation, however if true I wonder how will it affect Apple's stock?




 Posted by Hello

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Relaxing SSL validation for JaxWS

I've recently had the need to access a web service developed in .Net and signed with a self signed certificate. I've decided to use the JaxWS and the Metro stack to develop the client and run it on Java6. As a plus, the service was protected with username and password. The service was exposed on an IP address and I repetedly had problems in establishing a connection. In the end, thanks to this article, it was obvious that the certificate was not created with the alternative name attribute but it was not an option to change the certificate as the web service was already used by other consumers (.net clients don't suffer by this issue). So, on my quest to relax the validation, I've found out this article and code snippet, which did not compile at first (I guess package names were changed in JDK6) so I've did some trivial refactoring and now, after invoking the static methods in the client code, the SSL connection gets validated with no problems. Hope it helps and th...
Read more

Kaspersky Anti Virus 6 and Subversion problems

I've spent a good part of my day today in trying to understand why I can't checkout our subversion repository. I was getting this: svn: REPORT of '/svn/repos/!svn/vcc/default': 400 Bad Request google searches would make you think it's a proxy issue but I don't use or need one so after a lot of trial and errors I've found out that if you use Kaspersky Anti-Virus 6 it seems that if you use the Web Anti-Virus options with the recommended settings and you have the "Scan HTTP traffic" option on you end up with the problem above. It seems Kaspersky doesn't like the HTTP packets subversion uses so they get blocked. I really like Kaspersky and I recommend it to all but I hope they will address this issue as soon as possible as subversion is becoming the main open source VCS system. Any tips on this issue are welcome.
Read more

Search and Replace in ODT using AODL

Recently I needed to create a way to search and replace a word in a OpenOffice OpenDocument ODT. It would seem the project itself already has a library AODL (take care, at least two other project pages but with older code) that exposes the format model but I didn't find any utility methods like search and replace functionality. I've created two versions of the method, one a old-style, imperative approach, and the other, a LINQ version. As I'm still new to LINQ it would seem that the classical approach produces a more efficient code. Anyone care to chip in and make a faster algorithm? In this particular version I'm just going for simple string equality, I didn't want to go with other StringComparison methods (just look at the Equals overload method). public static void SearchAndReplaceString(TextDocument document, string searchText, string replaceText) { var content = document.Content; foreach (var item in content) ...
Read more