I've read this article in which Linus gives his point of view on GPL v3. I must say that I'm with Torvalds on this issue, not that I am pro-DRM oriented but because you shouldn't really impose restrictions on other people that you wish your software/hardware would need to work with. On one hand GPL does give you some rights but it also locks you to GPL-compatible alternatives as well and I really don't think it's the best developer licence there is.
The tragicomic thing about this is that we see GPL fighting GPL and I don't see it leading to anything positive.
That said, if one can afford the time and thinks that he can strike a adopter/abandoner balance the GPL v3 might be a valid alternative. I just don't think it's in Linux's interest and the current user and developer base to pass over to GPL v3.
The tragicomic thing about this is that we see GPL fighting GPL and I don't see it leading to anything positive.
That said, if one can afford the time and thinks that he can strike a adopter/abandoner balance the GPL v3 might be a valid alternative. I just don't think it's in Linux's interest and the current user and developer base to pass over to GPL v3.
Comments